The Fluoride Flaw

Hello all, its been a while since my last post.  I guess I just needed some time to recharge my intellectual batteries enough to get passionate about an issue.  What has instigated this passion is my research on the topic of water fluoridation and the sinister & coercive issues surrounding it.  Having spent a lot of time investigating the causes of cancer, I have  to spend some time discussing  Fluoride.

Water Fluoridation follow the same path as many other truthbreakdowns in our society such as Vaccinations, Chemotherapy, Radiation therapy, and most Big Pharma drugs.  Here are some commonalities:

  1. It is generally thought and promoted that these activities are normal, well-tested, and fully substantiated methods to create health or destroy disease.  When researched in depth, these activities are actually the reverse and this comes as a great shock to the researcher (as it did to me)
  2. These activities are promoted, supported, and utilized by the highest levels of government.
  3. These activities are pushed and almost forced on the majority of the human population under the guise of health for humanity.
  4. Billions (not millions) of $$$ are made off of these activities mainly through securing governmental support and contracts for mass distribution
  5. Big Pharma & Government fight tooth and nail to make sure these activities continue.  Why? A) $$$$$  B) Legal liability.  Imagine the class action lawsuits that would occur if the courts of public opinion & the courtrooms ruled that Water Fluoridation, Vaccinations, Chemotherapy, etc… all caused great harm to those it was given to.  Remember Asbestos and Tobacco? Yes they were once supported by doctors and government.
  6. Big Business has manipulated the facts and squashed the true facts through their control in government and their big $$ to fight in the courts.
  7. Labels those with oppositional scientific views as quackery or fringe wackos.
  8. Influence Medical School curriculum, FDA investigations, and scientific studies to produce the results and conclusions which support continued money making.
  9. Ignore & Squash competing alternative therapies which are successful, natural, way cheaper and far less collateral damage.  In short they monopolize their product even if it causes great harm and/or even kills people.
  10. Ignore & Squash doctors and other medical practitioners who have good success with alternative therapies.  Why? Eliminate the competition, especially the ones with great success with a far cheaper, non-patented protocol.
  11. Setup a system where alternative therapies have too many hoops & too much cost to gain scientific acceptance.  Big Pharma and Big Government have the funds and influence to get their methods instituted.

If you have read this list and are probably thinking that I am one of those conspiracy theorists and that our western culture is far too advanced and ethical to allow such treachery.  Think again.  I realize it may come as a shock, but get used to it.  Greed has a way of making humans do less than kind things.  It is especially hard for Big Pharma to stop when they get a taste of the Big $$$, like a vampire’s compulsion when they get a taste of blood.  As well Government has gone too far to admit guilt due to the potential legal implications.

Having visited numerous schools as a supply teacher over the past 15 years, I have seen the huge lists in the staff rooms of all the children with allergies, behavioral  disorders, ADHD, OCD, autism, auto-immune disease, cancer, and the list goes on.  My son’s friend jokingly yet frankly stated, “Ya almost all the kids in my school have some sort of disorder”.  The bottom line is, we are poisoning our population and most importantly poisoning our kids.

Putting Fluoride, though touted as the great savior of tooth decay,  in our water is simply unethical and dangerous.  Anyone with knowledge of Grade 11 chemistry will know that Fluorine, Chlorine, Bromine, and Iodine are all in the same family of elements in the Periodic Table known as the Halogens.  You will also know that Fluorine is similar to and resembles Iodine in our body as they are both in the same family of elements.  The difference is Fluorine is much more reactive than Iodine, and when its ion Fluoride enters our body, it displaces Iodine by attaching to receptors designed for Iodine.  You might say, “So what”.  Well, when one studies the importance of Iodine to our body, one will find that Iodine is one of the most significant elements in human biochemistry.   When Fluoride displaces Iodine in our body, critical processes become disrupted especially in the thyroid gland and our immune system.  Basically Fluoride disrupts human biochemistry at a cellular level.  Read more detail on this from Dr. Sircus.

Iodine Protects Against Fluoride Toxicity

You might say, “Come on, its well established that Fluoride fights tooth decay and it isn’t harmful to our body.  They wouldn’t put Fluoride in the water if it was unhealthy.”  Well, if this is what you think you need to read up on the history of Water Fluoridation and the health effects of Fluoride.  Check out non-chemo survivor of cancer, Chris Wark’s blog on the history of Water Fluoridation.

Fluoride: How A Toxic Poison Ended Up In Our Water Supply

For further reading on the health effects of Fluoride check out Dr. Mercola

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/04/30/water-fluoridation-facts.aspx

Haven’t tooth decay rates declined in communities which use water Fluoridation? Yes, BUT tooth decay rates have declined at the same rate in NON-Fluoridated communities.   Is the rate decline due to Fluoridation or just generally better oral hygiene?  The answer is obvious.  Check out the graph on declining tooth decay rates.

GRAPHIC: Tooth Decay Trends in Fluoridated vs. Non-Fluoridated Countries (WHO data)

Fluoride is not needed in your body and Iodine is, its as simple as that.

Spread the word and stop water fluoridation in your community.  While your on that note have a look a water Chlorination.  Chlorine is also a halogen element with sinister effects, but lets save this for another day.

 

Advertisements

Angelina Jolie sucked in

With this new Angelina Jolie breast mastectomy situation in the news lately, I think some common sense needs to be applied here. I subscribe to an email distribution from a nutritionist named Mike Geary. This is his take on the Jolie deal. Enjoy

———————————————————————
You are receiving this newsletter because you are a subscriber
to Mike Geary’s Lean-Body Secrets Ezine from TruthAboutAbs.
———————————————————————

I know this has turned out to be a massively controversial topic in the media with Angelina Jolie’s recent double mastectomy.

One thing I want us to keep in mind is that this was a personal decision for Angelina, and that deserves to be respected. To each their own.

However, the big concern here is that so many other women around the world that look up to such a high profile actress might think this is the best route to go if you carry the BRCA1 gene, that indicates increased risk for breast cancer.

The big issue is that Angelina was essentially LIED to about her risks. Just because you carry a gene that increases your likelyhood for a certain cancer doesn’t mean you can’t create a biochemical environment in your body that prevents the expression of that gene.

Remember that this isn’t an issue of “curing cancer”…. She didn’t have any cancer to begin with! This is an issue of PREVENTING cancer. And to cut off perfectly healthy body parts with the thought that you “might” somebody get cancer is not a mindset that I’ll ever understand.

Remember that the alternative is to create a biochemical environment in your body throughout your life that prevents the cancer in the first place regardless of which “risky genes” you carry.

A controversial article was published by NaturalNews.com about this very topic, and I’ll let you read it below and decide for yourself…

How Angelina Jolie was Duped by Cancer Doctors into Self Mutilation for Cancer She Never Had

by Mike Adams, NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) In a New York Times op-ed explaining her decision to have both of her breasts surgically removed even though she doesn’t have breast cancer, Angelina Jolie cited risk numbers as key to her decision. She said that doctors told her she had an “87% risk of breast cancer.” Her solution? Undergo three months of surgical procedures and have her breasts cut out.

Problem solved, right? With her breasts removed, she says her risk of breast cancer is now reduced to a mere 5 percent. The same bizarre logic can also be applied to men who cut off their testicles to “prevent testicular cancer” or people who cut out their colons to “prevent colorectal cancer.” But that would be insane, so nobody does that, because one of the most basic principles of medicine is that you don’t subject patients to the considerable risks and costs of surgery and anesthesia to remove organs that have no disease!

But the really sad part about all this is that Angelina Jolie was lied to. She didn’t have an 87% risk of breast cancer in the first place. All the women reading her NYT op-ed piece are also being lied to.

Here’s why…

How cancer doctors lie with statistics and use fear to scare women into high-profit procedures
The very idea that breast cancer is a “percent risk” is a complete lie. In reality, everyone has cancer micro-tumors in their bodies, including myself. Cancer is not a disease you just “get” like being randomly struck by lightning. It’s something you must “manage” or “prevent” day by day, meal by meal, through a lifestyle choice that involves vitamin D supplementation, nutrition, superfoods, vegetable juices and avoidance of cancer-causing chemicals and radiation.

So when a doctor says you have a “chance” of getting cancer, what he’s implying is that you have no control over cancer, and that’s an outright lie. Cancer quackery, in other words.

Even Jolie with her BRCA1 gene that’s linked to breast cancer can quite easily follow a dietary and lifestyle plan that suppresses BRCA1 gene expression. It’s not rocket science. It’s not even difficult. It can be done with simple foods that cost a few dollars a day. Those foods include raw citrus, resveratrol (red grapes or red wine), raw cruciferous vegetables, omega-3 oils and much more. Those same foods also help prevent heart disease, diabetes, Alzheimer’s and other chronic diseases.

Indole-3-carbinol (I3C), by the way, a natural chemical found in cruciferous vegetables like broccoli and cabbage, offers powerful prevention against BRCA1 gene expression. But you don’t hear cancer doctors telling women to “eat more cabbage” because that doesn’t make the cancer industry any money. You can buy I3C as a potent nutritional supplement from a variety of sources. It’s literally cancer prevention in a capsule.

So the whole “chance” argument is pure quackery. There is no chance involved in whether you get cancer. It’s all cause and effect. You are either living a pro-cancer lifestyle and therefore growing cancer, or you’re living an anti-cancer lifestyle and keeping cancer in check so that it never becomes a problem. Cause and effect is what results in either the growth of cancer tumors or the prevention of cancer tumors. There is no “luck” involved.

It’s fascinating, isn’t it, that medical doctors don’t believe in luck or voodoo on any topic other than cancer. But when it comes to cancer, they want all women to be suckered into the victim mentality that cancer is purely a matter of “luck” and therefore women have no control over their own health outcomes. How dis-empowering! How sick! How incredibly exploitive of women!

If you really want to be informed about breast cancer and the corrupt, dishonest cancer industry, read my related article 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You’re Not Supposed to Know. Or listen to our upcoming FREE Cancer Solutions Summit broadcasting this coming Monday, May 20th.

Why doesn’t the cancer industry empower women with a sense of control over their own health?

I find it astonishing that the cancer industry doesn’t believe in cause and effect. They would rather scare women with “risk” statistics that imply people have no control over cancer. Empowering women with a sense of control over their own health is the last thing the cancer industry wants to do, because that would cause them to lose customers and lose money.

It’s far more profitable to scare all women into a state of such irrational panic that they agree to the most insane things imaginable such as chopping off both their healthy breasts even though they have no cancer. Such women are then convinced they’ve literally saved their own lives by agreeing to be mutilated by cancer surgeons.

“My chances of developing breast cancer have dropped from 87 percent to under 5 percent,” says Jolie. “I can tell my children that they don’t need to fear they will lose me to breast cancer.”

Will she also tell her children they should mutilate themselves, too, as a form of medical disease prevention? And what happens if she learns she has a risk of brain cancer? Does she chop off her head and call it a cure?

The scam of making women believe there is only ONE way to reduce your “risk” of breast cancer

The other enormous scam in all this is the idea that there’s only one way to reduce your “risk” of breast cancer. Even if you believe the fictitious number of “87% risk,” why does everyone automatically assume there is one and only one way to lower that risk?

“For any woman reading this, I hope it helps you to know you have options,” writes Jolie in the NYT. Yet she utterly fails to offer women any options other than the one she took: check in to a cancer center and let them play “cut-poison-burn” on your body. Jolie’s op-ed piece, which reads as if it were written by the public relations department of the Pink Lotus Breast Center, offers nothing in the way of nutrition advice, lifestyle choices, holistic therapies, wellness, alternative medicine… nothing! What an incredible disservice to all the women of America…

In the world of health, nutrition and cancer, there are thousands of ways to prevent cancer and suppress the expression of BRCA1 genes. But Jolie and the cancer industry seem to imply no options exist other than chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery. Three options only. Nothing else exists in their world, not nutritional prevention, not vitamin D therapy, not vitamin C potentiated micro-chemotherapy, not ozone therapy, acupuncture, Chinese herbal medicine, stress reduction or anything else. You are supposed to believe that none of these things exist!

And why? Because the cancer industry wants to funnel women like cattle into their slash-poison-burn system of quack treatments. And Angelina Jolie is their new cheerleader. Scarred and no doubt experiencing the chest and armpit numbness that almost always accompanies mastectomy surgery, she now seeks to “inspire” other women to exercise their own sick “choice” and have their breasts removed, too!

It is the sickest invocation of women’s power that I’ve ever witnessed. This is not empowering women, it’s marching them into self-mutilation. And the “risk” is a complete fraud. In truth, Angelina Jolie had a higher risk of dying on the operating table than dying from breast cancer if she simply followed an anti-cancer lifestyle.

Don’t be tricked into self-mutilation by cancer industry quacks

In summary:

• The claim that you have a “percent risk” of breast cancer is a big lie which implies you have no control over cancer.

• BRCA1 genes can be kept quiet (suppressed) through proper foods and lifestyle choices. A gene is not a death sentence.

• The implication that there is only ONE way to reduce breast cancer risk is a complete lie. There are thousands of options and strategies for preventing cancer. Never be cornered into surgery by a group of surgeons pushing irrational fear.

• Cancer micro-tumors exist in everyone. Cancer must be “managed” in everyone to keep it in check and avoid the growth of tumors.

• The cancer industry tricks women using unethical fear tactics to scare women with false statistics into high-profit cancer procedures that only cause them harm.

• The claim that cutting off healthy breasts somehow “empowers” women is sick and demented. Women are far more empowered by honest information on nutrition and healthy living that allows them to keep their bodies intact rather than being sliced up by dishonest cancer surgeons.

-Mike Adams, NaturalNews.com
————————

I told you that it was a bit of a controversial article. But Mr Adams is on point with a lot of his arguments.

The important thing here is that gene expression can be suppressed with the right biochemical environment in your body through the right superfoods, preventing nutrient deficiencies, balancing hormones, controlling stress, avoiding inflammatory foods, avoiding carcinogenic chemicals, etc, etc.

In fact, remember that you can greatly reduce your risk of cancer and all other degenerative diseases by eating the right foods such as those featured in my manual here:

101 unique superfoods that control blood pressure, fight diabetes, protect brain health & help prevent cancer.

You do have power over prevention if you control your internal environment.

PS — fwd this email to your friends and family that are interested in this topic.

Mike Geary
Certified Nutrition Specialist
Certified Personal Trainer